Right now, I read some news which was unfortunately taken out of context when Dr. Scott Halstead has spoken about the whole Dengvaxia fiasco. GMA-7 has reported that Dengvaxia diagnosis can't be based alone on autopsy -- which itself may be true but most people still want to use the report to discredit Atty. Persida Rueda V. Acosta's current investigations. I think Atty. Acosta herself can use some of these hints which were left behind by the 87-year-old doctor. Here's what he said that may actually show reckless administration and what the Public Attorney's Office needs to consider in their latest forensic investigations: Halstead said that for any child who receives Dengvaxia doses and later dies, two things have to be considered before concluding that the two are connected: unequivocal evidence that the infection was caused by dengue virus, which can be done by either virus isolation or identification of NS1; and knowing if the particular individual was giv...
Just another blog discussing facts and opinions concerning the Philippines