Filipino Commie Organizers Are Against Economic Liberalization Because They Gain Power By Romanticizing And Politicizing Poverty

Some time ago, I remembered how I wrote a post last 2019 where I mentioned that Filipino commies aren't nationalists but selfish people who only want power. The very movement of Renato Reyes Jr. of Bayad Muna and Antonio Tinio of the Alliance of Complaining Teachers regarding the International Criminal Clown Court (ICC) would be very questionable. Tinio opposes pro-foreign investment policies yet you consider how he complains about the Philippines moving away from the ICC in the NETHERLANDS. Reyes' move to go to the ICC makes you realize that these guys are just after power. Why do you think they continue to lie about economic liberalization? It's because these guys just LOVE to gain power by romanticizing and politicizing poverty.

The recent community pantry with Ana Patricia Non of Maginhawa Community Pantry is something. The defense for Angel Locsin Colmenares (who is actually the auntie of Neri Colmenares due to her father's huge age gap with her mother) and the fact that she supports Gagabriela is something. What's interesting is that Get Real Pundit actually writes the following in regards to leftist-liberal militant groups:

The urban poor are pawns of leftist-liberal-militant groups in the advancement of their vested interest. There is nothing sincere about their movement because the leaders are comfortably ensconced in their residences. The leaders are dynastical as well because they hold on to their posts until death. Romanticization and politicization of the urban poor is what David and his colleagues specialize in. They are not sincere but are out to discredit the dictatorial and fascist regime of Duterte. But no person in his right mind should ever think that theirs is a noble purpose. They are hypocrites because they can’t call out one of their own while they continue to do the same against the administration. The ostentatious display of privilege exacerbates the divide between the rich and the poor. But think about it. Both are under the impression they are entitled to the same.

Its writer Ramon Ortoll actually got it RIGHT when he described the Filipino commies as HYPOCRITES who are comfortable in their own residences. Try to take a look at how Carlos Zarate's own son Zandro is in Italy, Toady Casino goes out with his family to nice places, Neri Colmenares seems to enjoy a lot of imported luxury products, Sarah Jane Elgago had a trip to Switzerland, Reyes shops at S&R and goes to Canada with his family, and Jose Maria Sison stays in the Netherlands instead of either China or Vietnam for a start. Why do they oppose liberalizing the economy and spreading their obvious lies such as only foreign investors will get rich? The real answer lies within Adolf Hitler's Nazi book Mein Kampf or My Struggle. It's all about their POWER STRUGGLE in maintaining their positions of power. 

Just imagine for a second if excessive restrictions against foreign investment were removed. The only thing that remains unchanged is foreign ownership of land - which isn't much of a big deal. Most foreign investors are usually more interested in renting a space. If there were more jobs then chances to get out of poverty will be much higher. Think about how foreign investments pulled several countries once poorer than the Philippines out of the dumps. Communist China was once poorer than the Philippines but now they've got the manpower to bully the Philippines. Communist Vietnam was once lower-ranked but now it shows power to defeat COVID-19. Don't those commies even know that? I believe they do but they, again, love to capitalize on the sufferings of the poor. It's what gives them a sense of power. If people are in so much poverty then it's very easy to be lured away into a loss of dignity to do dirty jobs like becoming goons or drug carriers. The poor are useful to these Filipino commies but not in a good way. 

Why do you think these commie organizers so insist on continuing ayudas? I believe it's because ayudas are a very easy way to control poor people. People need money and ayudas are what they want. I think that's why IBON Foundation supports ayudas but not foreign investment. It's because ayudas keep the poor dependent on them. Foreign investments will mean the poor will be dependent on jobs for hard-earned cash. Having more jobs means that commie organizers will run out of theatrical props and stooges for their plans. It would also mean there's very little to romanticize and politicize if poor people will have much higher chances to succeed in life.