Dilawans are indeed very blind like a certain stupid old man and his equally deranged wife. Both of them think that they are "older and wiser". They want to fight fake news but they use several biased sources (that lie that they aren't biased and say that they are always truthful) such as Philippine Daily Inquirer, ABiaS-CBN, CRappler and now Pignoy Ako Blog -- sources that only fact-check whenever it's convenient while spreading lies for their own convenience. Besides, all Pignoy Ako Blog's Jover does is blab and blab with usually no evidence -- only selecting pieces of evidence that best suits those who sign her paycheck!
Now what's even more obvious is that cheating really happened during the election... how honest is that huh?
This is something that mainstream Filipino media will always deny to Filipinos! Caught on camera -- how can machines vote when there is NO SHADING? Not tampered? Now who is stealing votes from who? Who is now the real thief between Bongbong Marcos and Leni Loud? Not to mention we need to remember the election rules last 2010 that should further prove dishonesty in elections.
Need we remind people of the IRREGULARITY of 25% shading in favor of Leni Loud over Bongbong Marcos. Wait a minute -- shouldn't we get back into the rules of the 2016 elections? Now it's time to see how the Dilawans are in fact inconsistent.
Here's the countdown for the May 2016 elections. Do you remember when James Jimenez of the COMELEC actually drilled people to shade it fully as 100%? It almost reminds me of the entrance test results in any school. Isn't part of the instruction for your answer to be valid and read by the machine that the circle must be shaded 100% with the pentel pen provided if any? Then why are the Dilawans wanting to honor the 25% shading which is an OBVIOUS VIOLATION of the threshold held by COMELEC before the elections began? So everybody must follow that rule except the Yellow Camp? That's a plain double standard! They should allow those ballots to pass through at least one PCOS machine that hasn't been tampered with to prove that those votes were legitimate!
Now Jimenez decides to even go as far as to confuse voters last February 2019 with this statement as reported by GMA News:
The Commission on Elections (Comelec) on Wednesday reminded voters to properly shade ballots for the upcoming May elections with the correct marking pen.
Comelec spokesperson James Jimenez reiterated that the shading threshold is 25%, meaning the vote counting machines will count as a vote an oval with a quarter of it shaded.
But the Comelec official still advised voters to fully shade the oval. Jimenez also said shading can go beyond the oval, adding: “Hindi naman ito coloring book.”
Will he please make up his mind? Didn't he mention that the ORIGINAL THRESHOLD is 100% no more and no less?
Fake news spreaders that claim they supposedly fight fake news?
How can the Dilawans even be fake news crybabies when they are fake news spreaders themselves? What's their other favorite sources aside from ABiaS-CBN, Inquirer, CRappler and Pignoy Ako Blog? Comic books like the "hit" called "Sa Gitna Ng Unos" (In the Middle of a Storm) where it falsely depicted Mar Roxas as the superhero of Yolanda? Maalala Mo Kaya? Then we can talk about Change Scamming, Silent No More, Madam Claudia, Pepeng Makabayad and other similar websites and social media pages that are spreading disinformation together with truthful information. After all, the best way to convince people you're not a peddler of fake news is to use half-truths -- refute any fake claims that idiots like Mocha Usok (or any Dutertard) makes, publish truths but only when its convenient then make their own fake news. They need to tell some degree of truth to make their fake news look credible, right?
A good example is how CRappler wanted to make it look like thousands walked in a nationwide protest against President Duterte while CNN Philippines only reported hundreds! If they think a hundred is a thousand then congratulations -- didn't Leni Loud even go as far as to say that 40 x 4 = 1600? That's elementary mathematics! I may not be good in math but I know my basic mathematics needed to function for daily life!
Maria Ressa can't forever the fake crusader against fake news forever for this reason. She and her crew are guiltyof even producing fake news against Tsinoy businessman Wilfredo Keng. She's raising "defend press freedom" which further puts her into more hot water. She's spreading fake news that she's a victim of oppression when in fact -- she's chased for her tax evasion, violating the current laws regarding media entity (which I think should be revoked to downplay the oligarch networks) and what she did to Keng wasn't simple libel. While libel shouldn't always be considered a criminal offense what what CRappler did is more than just simple libel -- they ruined and endangered the life of Keng himself with heavy false accusations! It wasn't just the false accusation but the fact that Keng's life was ruined. The fact that CRappler is supposedly a news organization makes it even more liable than the average naysayer who you are better off leaving alone!
That is but a few. Who knows how many more lives were damaged by the malicious fake news cooked up by the Dilawans?
More false information spread by the Dilawans about constitutional reform?
We should consider the real problem they have isn't President Rodrigo R. Duterte, not House Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, not Fidel V. Ramos BUT it's all on the idea of constitutional reform. Let's consider the most common ones.
Should it be surprising that CRappler has ties with communist Bayad Muna member Teddy errr Toady Casino? I guess he was requested to write against President Duterte's plan for charter change or constitutional correction because it goes against their interests. So what lies are commonly spread by the Dilawans and Casino both agree one by one.
My favorite one to address is the frequent lie against foreign direct investors. Why would they make up such lies like that only the foreign companies will get rich if you allow them to invest in the Philippines or that foreign investors are foreign invaders? I remembered how both Raissa Robles and Winnie Monsod said that Singapore didn't benefit from foreign investors. Others keep saying the Philippines will lose their sovereignty. They need to answer why didn't Singapore, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Vietnam, India, Israel and other countries that welcome foreign investors well lose sovereignty? Their so-called nationalism should be dismissed because I believe that these anti-FDI losers know that they are lying -- it's all about protecting their selfish interests. They hire gullible morons to spread their toxic agenda because they only care about themselves!
There was also the scare about the parliamentary. Aside from the claim of "the Philippines is better of as presidential due to the fact we've got hundred of years experience in it" -- some of them go as far as to vilify the parliamentary as evil. There was even the fake news that setting up Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo as the House Speaker means she's automatically the prime minister. The House Speaker is NOT the prime minister -- they are two separate offices! Yes, she can become prime minister but she has to prove herself. To say that it's all about making sure President Duterte rules forever is also stupid. How can President Duterte seize absolute power when the typical parliamentary system has both Government and Opposition on each others' toes in a weekly debate?
Lastly, there's about federalism. Same crazy old man I mentioned earlier says that there are 18 drafts and that it will mean there will be 17 constitutions under one constitution. Yet that crazy old man hypocritically lives in Australia -- a country that benefits from foreign investors (which he tends to say is colonial mentality), federalism and parliamentary. There's no one size fits all for the federal system -- what the Philippines needs is asymmetrical federalism where there's one constitution for the whole state. Where did he get his idea that federalism automatically means several different constitutions and will divide the nation? They also confuse federalism with feudalism. Federalism doesn't give rise to warlords -- it's feudalism! Watching Game of Thrones too much?
There was also the scare about the parliamentary. Aside from the claim of "the Philippines is better of as presidential due to the fact we've got hundred of years experience in it" -- some of them go as far as to vilify the parliamentary as evil. There was even the fake news that setting up Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo as the House Speaker means she's automatically the prime minister. The House Speaker is NOT the prime minister -- they are two separate offices! Yes, she can become prime minister but she has to prove herself. To say that it's all about making sure President Duterte rules forever is also stupid. How can President Duterte seize absolute power when the typical parliamentary system has both Government and Opposition on each others' toes in a weekly debate?
Lastly, there's about federalism. Same crazy old man I mentioned earlier says that there are 18 drafts and that it will mean there will be 17 constitutions under one constitution. Yet that crazy old man hypocritically lives in Australia -- a country that benefits from foreign investors (which he tends to say is colonial mentality), federalism and parliamentary. There's no one size fits all for the federal system -- what the Philippines needs is asymmetrical federalism where there's one constitution for the whole state. Where did he get his idea that federalism automatically means several different constitutions and will divide the nation? They also confuse federalism with feudalism. Federalism doesn't give rise to warlords -- it's feudalism! Watching Game of Thrones too much?
What about Sara Duterte's statement on honesty?
It's highly possible that Davao Mayor Sara Duterte herself was being sarcastic. One truth that REALLY hits the Dilawans is this -- they are not as clean as a whistle or as honest as they think. By admitting that all politicians lie may have made Sara actually her more honest about the truth. She's probably just baiting out the Dilawans concerning their hypocrisy for all we know!
__________
Now it's time to dedicate this song to the Dilawans, right?
Comments
Post a Comment