Are The Yellowtards (Plus Their Allies) Now Even Paying Drug Pushers To Help Produce "Evidence"?

Black propaganda is black propaganda isn't it? From fake pro-DDS pages that spread fake news (which are most likely manufactured by the Dilawans themselves) and now here's something interesting. It turns out that according to the social media page "The Filipino Advocate" -- a construction worker was caught selling shabu on Good Friday. The source was none other than ABiaS-CBN. The article doesn't have the picture anymore but "The Filipino Advocate" still has the picture of who is apparently a DDS supporter selling shabu.

There's always such a thing as manufacturing fake evidence. Why not pay someone to be their dummy? I suspect that this construction worker caught selling shabu was actually paid to wear the DU30 t-shirt. The person was said to have been arrested in General Santos and now he's arrested in Davao City. It seems that some of President Duterte's enemies in Davao City paid this guy to wear a DU30 T-shirt and get arrested on purpose. If this guy was able to get out of General Santos via bail then probably he will get out of jail in Davao City again by bail. This looks like he's a dummy agent set up all along.

This construction worker only reported as "Aikel" may be a paid dummy. Maybe, he allowed himself to get arrested to destroy the Davao City police as a possible smear campaign against Sara Duterte-Carpio and Paolo Duterte. I even wonder is it possible that "Aikel" himself may be also be willing dummy for Senator Antonio Trillanes IV? Trillanes has been having "confidential trips" to China which has me believe he's probably secretly meeting with Chinese drug cartels while trying to maintain a "clean and honest image" in public. Why do you think Trillanes didn't answer Juan Ponce-Enrile the question regarding the former's trips to China? It seems that there's some dirty business going on! 

This also wants me to raise for the nth time the contradictory things they do. They even hired an they support Agnes Callamard who promotes Carl Hart's dangerous statement that shabu supposedly doesn't cause brain damage or lead to acts of violence. If shabu as Hart claims and as Callamard believes it doesn't supposedly damage the brain or cause acts of violence -- why even accuse without any real credible proof that President Duterte is involved with drug cartels and setting up a phony drug war? Sure, there are others who don't like President Duterte but they don't stoop so low to that level. They better attempt to explain away their contradiction then again can you explain away contradictory behavior?