The Problem When The Anti-Corruption Office Got Corrupted Itself

One could think of Conchita Carpio-Morales' statement that she's isn't biased. I wonder if she even didn't bother to do any investigation on Sara Duterte's alleged cases to see whether they were true or not because she's her niece-in-law. Even if her niece-in-law Sara is innocent it should be put into mind that all complaints must be proven true or false. Now it's time to think about the current maintenance needed by the Ombudsman itself.

Shouldn't the Ombudsman motion not to let certain people run for political place in the first place? I thought about it if it's true that President Rodrigo R. Duterte has his charges in Davao then why didn't they move on it while he was still mayor? Why move when only he's president? I should also put to question that what if President Duterte's alleged charges were true then we have Marbobo Roxas and Jejemon Binay who were both allowed to run the race against President Duterte. Is she charging Noynoy Aquino for SAF-44 because she's a woman of integrity or is it because she's just biting at him like a mad dog? I don't claim to have the answers. 

It should be interesting to think that to say you're not biased but you're biased is stupid. Right now, it's time to have the Ombudsman investigated itself for possible corruption like every other office. It's like the Commission on Human Rights should be investigated for any possible violations of human rights. Every office in the government should be investigated every now and then and none is exempt from maintenance

Right now, it's time to think about checking the Ombudsman too for possible corruption charges. After all, how can you help fight corruption from government officials if the anti-corruption office got corrupted itself? 

Comments