Pinoy Commietards Appeal To First World Countries' COVID-19 Success While Being Against Constitutional Reform

I don't have ANYTHING against criticizing President Rodrigo R. Duterte but against the failure of the opposition to give better alternatives. Then you've got Pinoy anti-reform wokes who are always criticizing and criticizing WITHOUT giving better alternatives. In fact, they are somehow too many to name. I guess they're already accustomed to thinking that change in leadership is better than change in system. It's already observed that they have even cited the success of other countries in fighting COVID-19 like Taiwan or "lower-ranked" Vietnam (as if it's still lower-ranked and it's now surpassing the Philippines) in defeating the virus. It's been a question of both people AND systems when it comes to winning against COVID-19. The same formula is TRIED and TESTED yet we consider that Cory Aquino didn't do much to heal the damage done by the Marcos Regime. Overthrowing Joseph Estrada soon paved way for the possibility of somebody with NO POLITICAL EXPERIENCE namely the late Fernando Poe Jr. to lead the country.

They have mentioned that other countries have already done their mass testing but are they even WILLING to follow simple guidelines? Mass testing is something that can't be easily implemented. Bantay Nakaw dares to appeal to Taiwan in criticizing Duterte but consider what Vice President Chen Chien-Jen has to say. Chen is Taiwan's leading epidemiologist but not the "beloved" Vice President Leni Loud Robredo. When Leni Loud may seldom hit the mark but she might consider getting more advice from epidemiologists in her Angat Buhay Program and the same goes for Duterte. They say that pasaways are not to blame and that pasaways are everywhere BUT do they know that most first world countries have a MUCH LOWER RATE of pasaways? First world countries that have a high rate of pasaways soon start to decline like the "beloved" United States of America (USA).

Others are making a list of stuff they want for a post-pandemic Philippines. Some of them are demanding for food sufficiency, world-class universal healthcare, a drastic reduction of poverty, universal basic income, pandemic-disaster ready society, scientific driven politics, data-driven government decisions, and a modern forward-thinking leader. While I want to drop the universal basic income (because it's a socialistic policy) but the other demands are pretty good. All they do is still blame the Marcos Years never mind that Japan rose within ten years after the end of the Empire of Japan. They still blame the Marcos Years for today's failure never mind that Singapore was way poorer but is now way richer than the Philippines. However, what's the use of having demands for a pandemic-disaster ready society when they don't want constitutional reform? All they do is act like a bunch of spoiled children with their "Gimme this! Gimme that!" without considering the source of funds where to buy this and that.

You start talking to them about the need for constitutional reform to get most of their demands done and they've got all their LONG RANGE of excuses. I wonder where they get their bad reasoning from? It's really getting tiring and frustrating to talk about foreign investment when these people subscribe to the loser mindset of economic protectionism. They love to talk about how only foreign investors will get rich - they better TELL THAT to the first world countries first!  Talk about changing from presidential to the parliamentary system and all they will say is that it'll give rise to another Marcos-type dictatorship. One of their reasons is because the prime minister is not elected by the people but by the parliament. Another factor in them not wanting to shift to parliamentary is that they don't understand how the parliamentary system works. They want to hold the government accountable? Why not have a formalized opposition then? Then federalism is often confused with dividing the country or having multiple constitutions. Note, Malaysia only has ONE constitution. Also, federalism and feudalism are two different worlds. Federalism doesn't bring forth warlordism - it's feudalism. Dyslexic or dishonest? Also, federalism is all about giving regions more governing power so they don't become overdependent on the capital. Malaysia is more effective than Indonesia (both are developed countries) because of federalism. Indonesia could've decentralized itself to spread development even better.

Since when have the Pinoy commietards really known about hard work and economics? I guess they've been used to the idea of a communist utopia where everything is free when it doesn't work. A news report in Venezuela has shown that its protectionist policies have basic goods costing more than a month's wages. North Korea for decades hasn't become a utopia. Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward had only brought forth a disaster that made China even poorer than the post-Marcos Years. Mao's anti-capitalist policies backfired pretty badly that it left Deng Xiaoping with a much bigger mess to solve. For their information - the first world countries are not protectionist but they are competitive free markets. The irony also is that they hate capitalism but LOVE its products. Also, history has shown that anti-capitalist propaganda is always produced by capitalist products. The infamous communist Italian director Pier Paolo Pasolini published his utter-disgusting film (better NOT watch it) called 100 Days in Sodom. He certainly used a lot of capitalist devices to produce his disgusting "masterpiece" which he died before it was released. Pinoy commietards are no different when they use imported capitalist devices to combat capitalism. They've been walking contradictions but they could care less as long as it's convenient for them, right?