Could Pignoy Ako Blog Possibly Be A Communist Legal Front?


A new entry of Pignoy Ako Blog has Jover Laurio seemingly and indirectly quoting Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith as where the title of her entry  is "Is This How Our Liberty Dies?" The same entry is now making me wonder if Pignoy Ako Blog could be a legal front for communists. Remember that this entry is just speculation. I don't have the answers and I'm expressing my OPINION to why I think the blog (or maybe even organization as Jover doesn't seem to be the only writer) could be a communist legal front. 


Above is the graphic caption of the same post where she badmouths the Anti-Terrorist Bill. Junk the terror bill? The recent blog post which I just shared is pleading to dump the Anti-Terrorist Bill. Dump the anti-terrorism bill? I wonder does Jover fear the bill itself or just fear whatever abuses the bill if turned into law will bring? It's one thing to fear abuses being done by soldiers and policemen vs. fearing soldiers and policemen themselves for their existence. It's good to fear the possible abuses that could happen with the Anti-Terrorist Bill. That's why I believe the bill needs to be reviewed if basic human rights are possibly in danger such as the right to privacy, the right to a fair trial, and the right not to be punished beyond your crime. Those are valid concerns when you're filing an anti-terrorism bill that could be misused and abused sooner or later. The bill should be reviewed for any faulty provisions before its actual implementation.

Jover's wish isn't to amend but to dump the Anti-Terrorist Bill but to JUNK IT. She's using cards from Thinking Millennials which is in all possibility a COMMUNIST organization. A lot of millennials today are already attracted to socialism. She could've decided to read the provisions of the Anti-Terrorist Bill but I guess she decided not to. The bill if it does have faulty provisions then the lawmakers must make necessary amendments by deleting them and adding security provisions in the case of abuse. For example, if the bill decides to arrest people without proper investigation then that has to be removed. I think the Anti-Terrorist Bill should also specify punishment for policemen and soldiers who commit acts of terror. I personally want to see policemen and soldiers who violate the anti-terrorism bill to be given a double penalty because they bear heavier responsibility than civilians.

Coincidence or not?

We can also consider a string of events that may create a trail that could pinpoint that Jover could be a communist paid hack herself. Above is a collage representing the Inquirer's poor choice of cover girls. Jover was made "Filipino of the Year" last 2017 which should be very baffling. I'd like to ask what great thing did Jover do? Did she even fight the battle of Marawi and liberated it from the Maute family? What great thing did Jover do last 2017? Did she come up with a great economic plan that would help the Philippines become a progressive country? She just played the victim and Inquirer made her Filipino of the Year. You've got the "Filipinas for Change" which involves five COMMUNIST bitches. Sarah Elago herself is still making waves for Kabataan Partylist due to her current term as a congresswoman. Ironically, she's not at the center considering she might be the darling muse of Kabataan Partylist. Though this doesn't seem to be much of a coincidence when you consider other events that happened. Take note that Pignoy Ako Blog is also very much against constitutional reform - reforms that could actually depower communists in the Philippines such as foreign investments, the parliamentary system, and federalism. If that's the case then Jover should've taken her vacation in North Korea instead of Taiwan.

Communists and ABiaS-CBN make a strange alliance indeed!

Consider the COMMUNIST outrage regarding ABiaS-CBN shutdown. Rigoberto Tiglao has been a favorite target of Pignoy Ako Blog as a supposed purveyor of fake news. Remember the quote by Joseph Goebbels? It's to accuse others of what you are guilty of. It's safe to assume that Jover might be doing that same thing to her critics - accuse them of what she's guilty of. Tiglao long ago also exposed how the Lopezes were allied with the MARCOSES and the COMMUNISTS on two separate occasions. Tiglao's exposition of the Lopezes shows that ABiaS-CBN seems to be a mercenary network that goes for the highest bidder. Back then, it was a propaganda machine of the dark Marcos years. Later, Marcos' shutting it down was probably a big mistake on his part - he ended up making a villainous comrade look like a "hero" in the eyes of the people. ABiaS-CBN was truly shut down at that time. Recently, the only thing shut down with ABiaS-CBN is its right to use the free airwaves. They are still on the Internet and Cable TV which reveals that there's a misleading campaign going on. This also makes me suspect that the National Union of Journalists in the Philippines might actually also be a communist front. Why suddenly cry about freedom of press when they were red-tagged? It does suggest that they are guilty. 

We've had ABiaS-CBN getting defended by COMMUNIST lawmakers in the name of freedom of speech. Also, Toady Casino a communist is defending ABiaS-CBN calling it a fight for democracy and press freedom. Again, Casino has written for CRappler and one of them involves his fight against constitutional reform. After that, the outrage by communists over ABiaS-CBN shutdown makes you wonder about the consistency. I thought communism is anti-capitalism and aren't communist countries against freedom of speech? If communists are against capitalism and believe big businesses are evil then why are they defending ABiaS-CBN which itself is a BIG BUSINESS? I wonder was ABiaS-CBN waiting for the day when only them and only them will be the one "national TV" for Filipinos and nothing more? It seems like it! Jover is also defending ABiaS-CBN in some of her posts. One has to wonder if the series of events is actually pointing out that Jover herself could be a communist swine herself. 

I think Jover's funding is not solely done by the #PaBoostNiKris which was leaked by Nicko Falcis. I think she probably has other funding. Leni Loud Robredo? Maybe, maybe not but I think it's possible though I can't prove it either. Antonio Trillanes IV? Maybe, maybe not. What's more amazing to know is that the Magdalo might be in cahoots with the New People's Army or NPA. It also seems that Frank Baklaan is defending the NPA. Not to mention, Ninoy Aquino did want to legalize the Communist Party of the Philippines to have a voice. That statement from one of his speeches did really me lose my admiration for that man. I used to admire Ninoy along Jose Rizal and used the former to blast his admirers who loved being pasaway. Ninoy himself was probably no hero just as Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was no hero either. It's highly possible that Jover might also be receiving money from Bayad Muna and all related organizations or even from Joma Sison himself. Sison is probably sending some money from the Netherlands converted to Philippine peso to help give Jover the boosts she badly needs. 

Right now, this is mostly speculation with some facts presented to defend it. Jover's actions seem to suggest that she's actually a paid communist agent. She's probably just pretending to be for democracy when she might be a communist herself. Get Real Philippines has even revealed that Jover herself practices palamunin culture. Laziness is also one good reason why people easily get scammed by communist movements. Handouts? Welfare state? Victim state mentality to the max? That's very appealing to today's youth especially the snowflake generation. It seems that's what Jover wants and that's why I think she might be in cahoots with Filipino communist groups too. She would probably play the victim again (such as her questionable claim of having a stroke where she had HUMBA and FRIED CHICKEN served to her) but let's see if it'll still work. If it's true that's she's indeed working with communists then jailing her would no longer be an issue of press freedom. Rather, it's her being an accomplice in spreading seditious propaganda. 

Comments