Arguing With A Yellowtard Means Getting Stuck In Paulit-Ulit Land

A debate is a real challenge and picking the right opponent is a must. A debate is meant to be a formal discussion to settle disputes. However, debating with a Yellowtard turns every debate from a formal discussion into an informal argument. How is it so? I just thought about how arguing with a Yellowtard who thinks that there's no need to change the form of governance is a good example.

Allow me to give an illustration of how arguing with a Yellowtard gets you stuck in Paulit-Ulit Land. A certain crazy 4Ps-obsessed old man would just spin around in circles. He always goes around in circles with his argument about 4Ps, that the Philippines should remain unitary-presidential because of the hundred years argument and his unsubstantiated accusations against President Rodrigo R. Duterte would serve as a good example. He may tell you he's neither red nor yellow but he's a diehard yellow in his support for #OtsoDiretso, his defense that Leila De Lima is supposedly "clean as a whistle" and that he glorifies Noynoy Aquino like he had no faults. He would only do paulit-paulit or repetitive arguments which he believes validates his invalid arguments. His only best sources are biased such as CRappler, ABiaS-CBN or any media ran by the Philippine oligarchy. Not to mention he loves to flip his stance whenever it's convenient.

That's why PDP-Laban senatorial candidates have been smart enough NOT to debate with #OtsoDiretso. PDP-Laban want a debate on important issues? They better debate with Atty. Glenn Chong, Dr. Willie Ong and Atty. Larry Gadon who are truly intelligent opposition. You may want to consider debating with Panfilo Lacson and Richard Gordon. Just avoid #OtsoDiretsoSaImpiyerno completely because you'll just get stuck in Paulit-Ulit Land!