The Dilawans Would Now Rather Trust The Criminals Than The Cops?

The logic of the Dilawans is indeed amazing in so many levels. Now, one of the Dilawans' most die hard supporters #SilentNoMore is now using more fear-mongering by saying that police uniforms are now the most frightening costumes ever? I want to think about the screwed logic behind #SilentNoMore with their whole "you must fear the cops now". This is already suggesting that it's better to trust the criminals than the cops huh? 

I could remember the whole reason why the Commission on Human Rights nearly got defunded. Although former house speaker Pantaleon Alvarez is an idiot -- however he's partly right in saying that Chito Gascon should ask budget from the criminals. Though the better way of dealing with it is FIRING Gascon from his post and telling him to look for jobs among criminals than the government. The CHR in its mandate was not meant to just go after state agents. Instead, it was supposed to help the government in the check and balance process. CHR under idiots like Gascon, Leila De Lima and Etta Rosales ends up becoming a tool to prevent justice rather than make sure policemen do their jobs right. There's a thin line between CHR intervening with policemen who abuse their authority and stopping them from doing their duties to protect the human rights of people.

True, people need to fear law enforcement to a certain extent (such as the fear of paying certain fines for certain civil offenses) but not in the way that the Dilawans are trying to make it happen. This is not the healthy kind of fear where it serves as a defense mechanism. Rather, this is irrational fear or hysteria. They probably just fear cops for the sake of fearing cops. What are they complaining about? I guess it's because newer reports show how much shabu and other dangerous drugs have been seized as of late. It's probably because of the latest report that President Duterte plans to put the Bureau of Customs under military supervision after he's fired, several custom officers.

I guess they even want to have their reasoning that criminals kill "for a reason" and cops kill "without a reason" for someone to trust criminals over cops. I don't really care who breaks the law and what reasons you have. Whether you have a reason or no reason for committing murder -- it's still murder nonetheless! A cop who breaks the law is already considered a criminal and should be treated as such. I guess they should take the challenge of would they call a criminal if a criminal broke into their house and they are defenseless against it? I guess if a thief broke into their house then they would call a killer to defend them? Hmmm, talk about trying to hire Jason Voorhees to help you if Leatherface broke into your house. The logic of doing so would be stupid because all it does is replace one danger with another danger. That means should they really need help then they can forget about law enforcement to help them!