Hilarious Davide Jr. VS. John Gokongwei Jr. On Economic Constitutional Reform

It doesn't take an economist or a political analyst to understand who's right -- if you are diligent enough to do some self-research on basic politics and economics. It's time to do a study on Hilarious Davide Jr. and John Gokongwei Jr. on who's more qualified to talk about economic constitutional reform.

A comparison shows a bit of which expertise is which. Davide doesn't know business and economics while Gokongwei knows how business and economics works. In my journey to learn -- I know which man I'd go for legal advice in court and which man I'd go to consult to make a good economic model. The choice is clear that it's a wise decision to listen to Gokongwei about economic constitutional reform than Davide. What does Davide know much about business and economics and his current statements about economic liberalization prove it.

Why is Gokongwei more qualified to talk about the need and advantages of economic reforms in the constitution? It's all because of how he's applied his knowledge in business. I may not be a political analyst but I agree that charter change would be the better -- it changes the top leaders without the need of a revolution. He also mentions that opening up the economy will require making amends to the current constitution. He's also right to say that countries also need foreign capital to help develop its economy. The current 60-40 rule is indeed an obstacle to badly needed foreign investment.

I dare people reading this to tell Gokongwei that only foreign investors will get rich in his face. Come on -- I dare them to try and prove him wrong. The response will most likely be that he will just laugh at their nonsense. He may even tell them to try and prove that North Korea is doing better than South Korea. Who knows business better? Him or some chief justice who unfortunately doesn't know about basic economics and international marketing? The same goes for those leftist idiots like Neri Colmenares and Toady Casino. They will just be dismissed as idiots who ignore the basics of economics.